Customer Spotlight: Nearly 20 Years of ArenaKleen® at StirrUp Purpose

arenakleen dust control

Better Arena Footing. Less Dust. Nearly Two Decades of Trust.

For Jeff and Penny Campbell of Bend, Oregon, horses are about much more than riding.

Through their nonprofit organization, StirrUp Purpose, the Campbells provide equine experiences for children and adults with disabilities, veterans, and first responders. Creating a comfortable, dependable riding environment is an important part of their mission. For nearly 20 years, ArenaKleen® has been part of that environment.

A Relationship That Began in 2007

Jeff and Penny first began using ArenaKleen in their original riding arena in 2007. Over the years, they continued purchasing the product and recommending it to other arena owners throughout Central Oregon.

When they opened a new arena, however, they faced a familiar challenge: excessive dust and difficult footing conditions. Watering provided only temporary relief during the summer, often requiring repeated applications to keep dust under control. They turned once again to ArenaKleen.

More Than Dust Control

According to the Campbells, ArenaKleen has made a substantial difference in their new arena. Beyond controlling airborne dust, the product has helped create a more consistent riding surface. Their coarse sand footing now has a firm, stable feel without becoming overly compacted.

For an organization serving riders with a wide range of abilities and needs, dependable footing and reduced dust are important benefits. The improvements have helped Jeff and Penny provide the kind of riding environment they envisioned for the people and horses at StirrUp Purpose.

Nearly 20 Years of Customer Confidence

The Campbells’ experience extends well beyond a single application or riding season. Since becoming ArenaKleen customers in 2007, they have continued using the product and recommending it to other equestrian facilities in their region.

As Jeff Campbell explains:

“And we are ArenaKleen’s biggest advocates here in Central Oregon since, as I indicated earlier, we have been customers with our original arena since 2007.”

— Jeff Campbell, StirrUp Purpose | Bend, Oregon, https://stirruppurpose.org/

 

For GES, relationships like this represent what matters most: products that perform, customers who return, and the opportunity to support organizations doing meaningful work in their communities.

ArenaKleen®: Better footing. Less dust. Relationships that last.

Learn more about ArenaKleen and how it can improve your riding arena.

Beyond Water: Economical Dust Control and Light Surface Stabilization

DG Balance dust control

Water is still a common way to control dust on unpaved roads and work areas. It is readily available and easy to apply.

The problem is that it doesn’t work for very long.

Once the surface dries, traffic starts generating dust again and the water truck makes another pass. During hot and dry conditions, this may happen several times in the same day. Over the course of a project, the cost of the truck, driver, fuel, maintenance, water, and repeated applications can add up quickly.

At the other end of the spectrum are products designed for long-term soil and road stabilization. These can make sense for permanent roads or heavily trafficked surfaces, but they can also be more treatment than a temporary road or work area actually needs.

There is a fairly large gap between these two approaches. DG Balance™ was developed to fill that gap: an economical dust-control treatment that also provides some light, flexible stabilization of the surface.

Water Is Cheap. Watering Isn’t Cheap Dust Control.

One of the reasons water remains so common for dust control is that everyone understands it. Put water on a dusty road and the dust goes away.

But the cost of the water itself is only part of the equation.

Someone has to fill the truck, drive it, apply the water, and repeat the process when the road dries. The truck consumes fuel, requires maintenance, and is unavailable for other work while it is being used for dust control. At sites without a convenient water source, there is also the cost and logistics of getting the water where it is needed.

For a road that only needs occasional treatment, none of this may be a major concern. If the water truck is making repeated passes every day for weeks or months, however, it is worth looking at what that operation is actually costing.

This is where comparing treatments simply on cost per gallon can be misleading. The better comparison is the total cost of keeping the road under control for the duration of the project.

Sometimes You Just Need the Road to Perform Better

Dust problems and surface problems usually aren’t separate.

Traffic moves loose aggregate and fines around the road. As the aggregate breaks down, more fine material becomes available to create dust. Water temporarily suppresses those fines, but once the road dries, there is very little left to help hold the surface together.

A small amount of stabilization can make a meaningful difference.

That doesn’t mean the road needs to become hard or pavement-like. In many applications, the objective is simply to reduce loose material, provide some cohesion at the surface, and keep the road performing reasonably well under traffic.

DG Balance is designed around this idea. It provides dust control while also giving the treated material mild, flexible stabilization.

For a temporary construction road, industrial yard, or access road that may only be needed for a season or the duration of a project, that may be all the stabilization that is necessary.

A Step Between Water and Long-Term Stabilization

We don’t view DG Balance as a replacement for every watering program, and we don’t view it as a replacement for heavy-duty stabilization.

It sits between the two.

If inexpensive water is available, a water truck is already on site, and dust only needs to be controlled occasionally, water may still be the most practical choice.

If a road needs substantial structural improvement or long-term stabilization, a heavier stabilization treatment may make more sense.

DG Balance becomes particularly attractive when a site is spending significant time and money repeatedly watering a surface but doesn’t have the need or budget for a full stabilization program.

Instead of paying for the maximum possible performance, the customer is paying for the level of performance the project actually needs.

Where DG Balance Fits

We see this situation frequently on temporary construction and access roads, mine and quarry roads, industrial yards, laydown areas, gravel parking areas, utility projects, temporary haul roads, and other unpaved working surfaces.

These sites often have a similar requirement. They need to keep dust under control, they would benefit from a somewhat tighter and more stable surface, but they don’t necessarily need to build a permanent road.

Project duration matters too. There is little reason to design a treatment around years of service if the road will be removed or abandoned in six months.

In those situations, DG Balance can provide a practical balance of treatment cost, dust control, and surface improvement.

Look at the Cost Over the Life of the Project

A water truck can look inexpensive when viewed one application at a time.

The economics can look very different after adding up several applications per day, five or six days per week, over several months.

Every trip represents truck time, labor, fuel, maintenance, and water. If the surface dries and needs to be treated again, the same costs occur again.

DG Balance is intended to reduce that dependence on repeated watering while also providing some residual binding of the surface material. The exact performance and application frequency will depend on the soil or aggregate, traffic, weather, application rate, and other site conditions, which is why we prefer to evaluate the application rather than make a one-size-fits-all recommendation.

For many projects, the goal isn’t to eliminate every future application. It is simply to reduce how much time and money are being spent chasing dust with a water truck.

Finding the Right Level of Treatment

There is no reason to over-engineer a temporary road. There is also no reason to keep paying to control the same dust if a more persistent treatment makes better economic sense.

That is the niche DG Balance was designed to serve.

It is an economical dust-control option for sites that need more than water, along with some light stabilization, but don’t need the cost or performance of a heavy-duty stabilization program.

Global Environmental Solutions can review the surface material, traffic, size of the treatment area, project duration, and current watering program to determine whether DG Balance makes sense for a particular site.

If you are currently running water trucks regularly for dust control, contact GES. We can compare your existing watering program with a DG Balance treatment approach and determine whether there is an opportunity to reduce costs while improving surface performance.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a more economical alternative to watering dirt and gravel roads?

For sites that require frequent watering, a longer-lasting dust-control treatment may reduce the overall cost of managing dust. DG Balance™ is designed as an economical step up from water, providing dust control along with light surface stabilization. The best choice depends on water availability, traffic, road material, climate, and how long the road needs to remain in service.

How can I reduce the cost of watering roads for dust control?

Start by looking beyond the cost of the water itself. Calculate the cost of the water truck, driver, fuel, maintenance, filling time, water sourcing, and the number of applications required each day. If repeated watering represents a significant operating expense, a longer-lasting dust suppressant such as DG Balance may be more economical over the life of the project.

Is there a dust-control product that also helps stabilize a gravel road?

Yes. Some dust-control treatments also provide binding or stabilization of the surface material. DG Balance is designed to provide dust suppression together with mild, flexible stabilization. It is intended for applications where improved surface performance is useful but heavy-duty stabilization isn’t necessary.

What is the best dust control for a temporary construction road?

There isn’t one treatment that is best for every construction road. Water can make sense for very short-term applications, while more substantial stabilization may be appropriate for heavily trafficked roads that will remain in service for years. For temporary or intermediate-duration roads that require regular dust control, DG Balance can provide an economical option between repeated watering and full stabilization.

Is chemical dust control cheaper than using a water truck?

It can be, particularly when a road has to be watered several times per day over an extended period. The appropriate comparison is not the price of water versus the price of a dust suppressant per gallon. It is the total cost of keeping the road under control, including equipment, labor, fuel, maintenance, water sourcing, application frequency, and treatment longevity.

What is the difference between dust suppression and road stabilization?

Dust suppression primarily addresses airborne particles generated from the road surface. Stabilization improves the cohesion or strength of the road material itself. Some treatments, including DG Balance, fall between these categories by providing effective dust control along with light stabilization of the treated surface.

How do I know if DG Balance is right for my road?

The main factors are the road material, traffic level, climate, treatment area, available water, current watering frequency, required service life, and desired level of stabilization. GES can review these conditions and compare DG Balance with watering or other dust-control and stabilization approaches.

Floating Pond Covers: How Much Water Evaporation Is Costing Your Operation

floating water cover

Drought is again becoming a serious issue across much of the United States.

Farmers are dealing with reduced water availability and difficult growing conditions. Reservoir levels across parts of the West remain low. Mines and industrial facilities operating in water-constrained areas are paying increasingly close attention to where their water comes from and how much they use.

As of August 2026, drought conditions extend across a significant portion of the country. In the West, Lake Mead and Lake Powell remain at historically low levels. Agriculture is feeling the effects as well, with drought contributing to poor crop conditions and reduced production in several important growing regions.

There is no simple answer to a problem this large. More efficient irrigation, water reuse, groundwater management, conservation, recycling, and new infrastructure will all be needed.

But there is one source of water loss that is sometimes overlooked. The water already sitting in storage is evaporating.

For a mine, farm, industrial facility, municipality, or other operation that relies on stored water, that loss can be surprisingly large. A floating evaporation cover like EnviroBalls™ is one of the more practical ways to address it.

Water in Storage Has Already Cost Something

It’s easy to look at a pond or reservoir and think of the water as simply being there.

A farmer may have pumped that water from a well or diverted it during a limited period when water was available. A mine may have captured, treated, pumped, recycled, or purchased its water. An industrial facility may have significant treatment and energy costs invested in the water stored on site.

In each case, that water has value before it ever reaches the pond.

Once stored in an open reservoir, it’s exposed to sun, wind, heat, and dry air. In many western climates, several feet of water can be lost from an exposed surface over the course of a year.

That turns into a very large volume of water:

  • 1 acre-foot is approximately 326,000 gallons
  • A 1-acre pond losing 6 feet a year loses nearly 2 million gallons
  • A 10-acre pond at the same rate loses nearly 20 million gallons
  • A 50-acre pond loses nearly 100 million gallons

Those numbers get attention quickly when the water has to be pumped out of the ground, purchased, treated, or replaced.

Mine Water Evaporation: A Growing Cost in Nevada, Arizona, and Other Arid Mining Regions

Water management has always mattered to mining, particularly in arid parts of the United States, including Nevada, Arizona, and other Southwestern states, as well as South America, Australia, and other major mining regions. It’s becoming even more important.

Mines can have substantial volumes of water stored in process-water ponds, reclaim ponds, freshwater reservoirs, lined storage ponds, and other engineered basins. Many of these facilities sit in areas with high solar radiation, low humidity, wind, and limited rainfall. Those are exactly the conditions that drive significant evaporation.

Mining companies have already made considerable progress recycling and reusing process water, which makes sense. Water that’s difficult or expensive to obtain should be used as efficiently as practical. Evaporation deserves the same scrutiny.

If a mine pumps groundwater into a storage reservoir and then loses a portion of it to the atmosphere, additional water has to be pumped to replace that loss. That means more pumping, more energy, and more demand on the source. Where water rights or permitted withdrawals are limited, the value of preserving that water is even greater.

The question for a mine isn’t simply what a gallon of water costs. It’s what that gallon costs to replace.

Irrigation Pond Evaporation: A Problem for Farmers in Drought-Prone Regions

The economics are different for agriculture, but the basic problem is the same.

Irrigation ponds and reservoirs let farmers store water when it’s available and use it when crops need it. During drought, whether in California’s Central Valley, the Texas Panhandle, or other water-stressed growing regions, that stored supply becomes especially valuable.

Unfortunately, the hot, dry conditions that increase irrigation demand also increase evaporation. A farmer may be losing stored irrigation water at the exact moment crops need it most.

For smaller agricultural reservoirs, losses add up quickly. A 5-acre irrigation pond losing 5 feet of water annually loses roughly 8 million gallons to evaporation.

Not every gallon of that loss can practically be eliminated. But preserving even a portion of it could mean less groundwater pumping, more water available late in the growing season, or a larger reserve when drought conditions persist. In areas where wells are declining or allocations are tightening, that matters.

Ready to see what your reservoir is losing? [Request a free evaporation estimate]

The Same Economics Apply to Industry

Mining and agriculture are the obvious examples, but they aren’t the only industries storing valuable water.

Manufacturing facilities, power plants, wastewater facilities, food processors, data centers, utilities, chemical plants, refineries, and other industrial operations may maintain open ponds or reservoirs for process water, recycled water, cooling water, treated water, stormwater, or emergency storage.

The first question should always be what this water is worth to the operation.

If water is plentiful and inexpensive to replace, evaporation reduction may not be a priority. If the facility is pumping groundwater, purchasing water, treating it before storage, operating under withdrawal limits, or struggling with availability, the calculation looks very different.

This is why evaporation control shouldn’t be evaluated purely as an environmental measure. In many applications, it’s an operating-cost and water-security issue.

Can Floating Water Covers Reduce Evaporation?

One way to reduce evaporation is to reduce the amount of water surface directly exposed to the atmosphere.

Floating covers do this by creating a physical barrier across the water surface. Modular systems using floating spheres, such as EnviroBalls™, can adapt to changing water levels without the structural support a conventional roof or fixed cover would require.

The concept is simple. Reduce exposed water surface, and you reduce the interaction between water, solar radiation, wind, and dry air that drives evaporation.

Independent field studies of floating sphere systems have reported meaningful evaporation reductions, though actual performance varies with climate, coverage, wind, pond geometry, and operating conditions. Because of that variability, we don’t assume the same reduction for every site. The first step is always estimating how much water a given pond is actually losing.

Start With the Water Balance

Before considering a cover, an operator should know approximately how much water is being lost and what that water is worth.

For a preliminary analysis, we typically start with a few basic inputs:

  • Location
  • Surface area
  • Local climate
  • Source of water
  • Difficulty or cost of replacing that water

From there, annual evaporation can be estimated and converted into gallons lost per year. That figure is then compared against the expected reduction from a floating cover and the cost of installing the system. For some ponds, the economics won’t work. For others, particularly in dry climates where water is pumped, treated, purchased, or limited, the volume of water at stake can justify a much closer look.

Where Floating Covers Make the Most Sense

The strongest potential is in engineered ponds and reservoirs where water has a measurable operational value, including:

  • Mine process-water and freshwater ponds
  • Agricultural irrigation reservoirs
  • Industrial water-storage ponds
  • Municipal storage basins
  • Recycled-water reservoirs
  • Treated wastewater storage
  • Power-generation facility reservoirs

Large natural lakes are a very different problem. Covering Lake Mead or Lake Powell isn’t what we’re suggesting. But there are thousands of smaller engineered reservoirs where covering the water surface is practical enough to evaluate, and collectively those smaller ponds represent a significant amount of stored water.

Drought Changes the Value of the Water You Already Have

The important issue isn’t simply whether drought gets better or worse next year. Water demand is growing in many parts of the country while groundwater, surface-water allocations, infrastructure, and competing users constrain available supply.

Mining offers a good example. New critical-mineral projects are being proposed in some of the driest parts of the United States, and water availability is increasingly part of that development conversation.

Agriculture has dealt with this problem for far longer. When water becomes scarce, farmers face difficult decisions about acreage, irrigation, crops, and pumping.

Industry faces its own version of the same problem. In all three cases, conservation usually starts with reducing how much water is used. It should also include looking at how much stored water is being lost.

Sometimes the Best New Water Supply Is Water You Don’t Lose

Evaporation control won’t solve drought. It won’t refill the Colorado River, replace groundwater management, or eliminate the need for more efficient water use.

But that doesn’t make the losses unimportant.

  • If a mine preserves millions of gallons of process or freshwater annually, that water doesn’t have to be replaced.
  • If a farmer retains more irrigation water through the hottest part of the growing season, that water stays available for crops.
  • If an industrial facility reduces losses from a storage reservoir, it may reduce how much water has to be purchased, pumped, or treated.

There’s real value in each of those outcomes. We spend a great deal of money finding, pumping, transporting, treating, and storing water. It makes sense to look at what happens to it once it reaches the pond. Get started with GES today.

Common Questions About Evaporation and Industrial Water Storage

How much water can an open pond lose to evaporation? It depends on location, temperature, solar radiation, humidity, wind, elevation, and other conditions. In dry climates, annual evaporation can amount to several feet of water depth. Every foot of evaporation represents approximately 326,000 gallons per acre of water surface. Six feet of evaporation can mean nearly 2,000,000 gallons of water lost per year across one acre of stored water.

How much water could a mine lose from a process-water pond? The answer depends primarily on pond area and local evaporation conditions. For example, a 20-acre pond experiencing six feet of annual evaporation would have a gross evaporation loss of approximately 40 million gallons per year.

Can floating covers be used on mine water ponds? Yes. Floating covers can be evaluated for process-water ponds, freshwater storage, reclaim-water ponds, and other engineered mining reservoirs. Water chemistry, operating conditions, wind, pond geometry, equipment access, and other site-specific factors need to be considered.

Can evaporation covers reduce irrigation water losses? Yes. Agricultural reservoirs can lose significant volumes of stored irrigation water to evaporation, particularly in hot, dry climates. The economics depend on the evaporation rate, pond size, value of the stored water, and cost of the cover.

Does reducing evaporation also reduce pumping costs? It can. When evaporated water must be replaced with pumped groundwater or another pumped supply, preserving stored water can reduce the volume that needs to be replaced, along with the associated pumping requirement.

What industries could benefit from floating water covers? Potential applications include mining, agriculture, municipal water, wastewater, power generation, manufacturing, food processing, chemical processing, refineries, and other operations with open water-storage ponds or reservoirs.

How do I know whether an evaporation cover makes economic sense? Start by estimating annual evaporation in gallons and determining the cost or operational value of replacing that water. Compare those losses against the expected performance, installed cost, and useful life of a floating cover.

How Much Water Is Your Pond Losing?

Global Environmental Solutions can perform a preliminary evaporation assessment for a mine, farm, industrial facility, municipality, or other operation with an open water-storage pond. Contact GES today.

We start with the location and approximate surface area of the pond and estimate the potential annual evaporation loss. For sites that warrant additional analysis, we can then evaluate the potential water savings associated with a floating cover such as EnviroBalls™.

If your operation is pumping, purchasing, treating, or competing for water that ultimately sits in an open pond, it’s worth knowing how much of that water may be disappearing into the atmosphere each year.

Request Your Free Evaporation Estimate Send GES the location and approximate dimensions of your pond, and we’ll start the water-loss calculation.

High-Performance Dust Control for Mining

mining dust control

Improving Haul Road Performance, Reducing Maintenance, and Lowering Operating Costs

Prepared by
Global Environmental Solutions (GES)

Executive Summary

Dust control is more than a housekeeping issue in modern mining operations, it is an operational, environmental, and economic challenge. Dust generated from haul roads, crusher areas, stockpiles, tailings facilities, and plant roads can reduce visibility, increase equipment wear, accelerate road deterioration, increase water consumption, and contribute to worker exposure to respirable dust.

While water trucks remain the most common dust suppression method, water alone provides only temporary control and often requires continuous reapplication. Increasingly, mining operations are evaluating engineered dust control technologies that not only suppress dust, but also stabilize road surfaces, reduce maintenance, conserve water, and improve overall operating efficiency.

This article examines where engineered dust control products perform best in mining operations, the operational benefits beyond dust suppression, and the engineering considerations that determine long-term success.

Why It Matters

In many surface mining operations, haul roads are the single largest source of fugitive dust. Improving road performance not only reduces airborne dust, but also lowers maintenance costs, conserves water, and improves overall mine productivity.

Why Dust Control Matters in Mining

Every ton of material hauled across an unpaved road generates fine dust particles. As truck traffic increases, these particles are displaced from the road surface, resulting in:

  • Reduced visibility
  • Increased safety risks
  • Loss of valuable road fines
  • Increased washboarding and rutting
  • More frequent road maintenance
  • Higher water consumption
  • Increased equipment wear

Dust is therefore both a safety issue and a road maintenance issue.

The most successful dust control programs focus not only on suppressing airborne dust, but also on preserving the road surface itself.

High-Value Mining Applications

Haul Roads

Mine haul roads are typically the largest source of fugitive dust within a mining operation.

Heavy truck traffic breaks down aggregate surfaces, causing fine particles to become airborne while simultaneously degrading road quality.

Properly selected dust control and stabilization products can:

  • Bind surface fines
  • Reduce dust generation
  • Improve surface durability
  • Reduce washboarding
  • Reduce pothole formation
  • Extend grading intervals

The result is a smoother road that requires less maintenance while improving truck productivity.

Plant Roads

Roads surrounding processing plants experience continuous traffic from loaders, service vehicles, and haul trucks.

Dust generated in these areas can affect:

  • Plant operations
  • Equipment reliability
  • Employee safety
  • Housekeeping requirements

Engineered dust control products help maintain cleaner, more durable road surfaces while reducing maintenance requirements.

Crusher Areas

Crusher facilities generate significant quantities of fine particulate matter.

Dust suppression around crushers helps improve:

  • Operator visibility
  • Equipment cleanliness
  • Maintenance requirements
  • Working conditions

Because these areas often experience concentrated traffic and repeated disturbance, stabilizing exposed aggregate surfaces can substantially reduce airborne dust.

Tailings Facilities

Tailings storage facilities frequently contain large exposed surfaces that become susceptible to wind erosion during dry periods.

Depending on site conditions, engineered dust control products may help stabilize exposed surfaces and reduce windblown dust while minimizing disturbance to the facility.

Each tailings facility should be evaluated individually based on material characteristics, moisture conditions, and operational requirements.

Stockpiles

Aggregate, overburden, and mineral stockpiles are another common source of fugitive dust.

Temporary treatments can help:

  • Reduce wind erosion
  • Preserve stored material
  • Improve housekeeping
  • Reduce environmental complaints

Applications should be selected based on expected storage duration and operational activity.

Underground Mines

Underground mining presents unique dust challenges where ventilation systems can transport airborne particles throughout active workings.

Engineered dust control products may help reduce dust generation on underground haul roads while lowering watering requirements and improving trafficability.

Beyond Dust Suppression

Successful mining operations increasingly evaluate dust control based on total operating cost rather than application cost alone.

Potential operational benefits include:

  • Reduced water truck usage
  • Lower grader operating hours
  • Improved road surface stability
  • Reduced aggregate replacement
  • Lower equipment maintenance
  • Improved tire life
  • Improved truck cycle times
  • Better visibility
  • Improved working conditions

In many cases, these secondary benefits provide as much value as dust suppression itself.

Engineering Considerations

No single dust control technology performs equally well under every mining condition.

Successful projects begin by evaluating:

  • Traffic volume
  • Vehicle weight
  • Aggregate gradation
  • Fine particle content
  • Climate
  • Rainfall frequency
  • Water availability
  • Freeze-thaw conditions
  • Road geometry
  • Maintenance practices

These factors determine both product selection and application rate.

Engineered Dust Control Compared with Water

Performance Factor Water Engineered Dust Control Products
Immediate Dust Suppression Excellent Excellent
Long-Term Dust Control Low High
Surface Stabilization None Excellent
Reduced Grading No Yes
Reduced Water Consumption No Yes
Preservation of Road Fines No Yes
Maintenance Interval Short Extended

Water remains an important dust suppression tool, particularly for short-term control.

Engineered dust control products provide the additional benefit of improving the structural performance of the road surface while reducing long-term maintenance requirements.

Depending on site conditions, DustLess® may be preferred where long-term dust suppression is the primary objective, while DirtGlue® may be selected where both dust control and aggregate stabilization are desired.

Selecting the Right GES Solution

Every mining operation is different.

Traffic loading, aggregate characteristics, climate, and maintenance objectives all influence product selection.

DustLess® is designed primarily for long-term dust suppression while helping reduce watering frequency and improve operational efficiency.

DirtGlue® combines dust suppression with aggregate stabilization, helping preserve road fines, reduce grading frequency, and improve long-term haul road performance.

Successful applications begin with a site-specific engineering evaluation to determine the most appropriate solution.

Looking Ahead

Mining companies continue to seek practical methods for improving operational efficiency while reducing maintenance costs, water consumption, and environmental impacts.

Engineered dust control should not be viewed simply as a replacement for watering roads. Instead, it represents an engineering approach to improving haul road performance, preserving aggregate, reducing maintenance, and lowering the total cost of road ownership.

As operations place greater emphasis on sustainability, productivity, and worker safety, integrated road stabilization strategies will continue to play an increasingly important role in modern mine management.

Dust control should no longer be viewed solely as an environmental requirement. When properly engineered, it becomes an operational improvement strategy that reduces maintenance, conserves water, improves productivity, and extends the service life of mine infrastructure.

Free Preliminary Mining Road Assessment

Every mine is different.

Road geometry, aggregate quality, traffic loading, climate, and maintenance practices all influence dust generation and surface performance.

Global Environmental Solutions (GES) provides free preliminary engineering evaluations for mining operations considering improved dust control or haul road stabilization.

A preliminary assessment may include:

  • Estimated application rate
  • Expected dust reduction
  • Surface stabilization opportunities
  • Potential maintenance savings
  • Water use reduction
  • Preliminary product recommendations

To learn more or request a free preliminary mining road assessment, contact the GES team here.

Understanding Water Loss from Reservoir Evaporation

water evaporation

Prepared by
Global Environmental Solutions (GES)

Summary

Reservoir evaporation represents one of the largest continuous losses of stored freshwater across the United States. Collectively, the five reservoirs summarized in this report lose an estimated 460-610 billion gallons of water each year through evaporation along. As municipalities, agriculture, mining operations, power generation, and industry face increasing pressure on limited water resources, protecting stored water has become an increasingly important complement to conservation, infrastructure modernization, and water reuse.

This article is intended to provide a comparison of evaporation losses among well-studied reservoirs. The report is intended to support engineering discussions, strategic planning, and preliminary project evaluation. It is not intended for regulatory water accounting or legal water rights administration.

Introduction

Water scarcity continues to challenge municipalities, agriculture, mining, industrial operations, power generation, and environmental restoration throughout western North America. While infrastructure modernization, conservation programs, desalination, groundwater development, and water reuse remain essential components of long-term water security, evaporation from reservoirs and storage ponds represents a significant and frequently underappreciated source of water loss.

Unlike water demand, evaporation occurs continuously whenever atmospheric conditions favor vapor transfer from the water surface. High solar radiation, elevated temperatures, low relative humidity, persistent winds, and large exposed surface areas combine to produce substantial annual water losses across many western reservoirs.

Engineering solutions that reduce solar loading and wind-driven evaporation may complement existing conservation strategies while simultaneously improving water quality, reducing algae growth, minimizing wildlife interactions, and lowering long-term maintenance requirements.

This report summarizes published measurements and engineering estimates for fourteen strategically important North American reservoirs and presents a comparative assessment of representative annual evaporation losses.

Key Findings

  •  The five reservoirs summarized lose an estimated 460 – 610 billion gallons of water annually through evaporation.
  • Lake Mead and Lake Mohave provide the highest-quality publicly available evaporation measurements because they are based on direct U.S. Geological Survey field observations.
  • Reservoir evaporation varies considerably depending on climate, elevation, wind exposure, and reservoir geometry; therefore, site-specific evaluations are recommended when assessing water losses.

Reservoir Evaporation by the Numbers

Table 1. Representative Annual Reservoir Evaporation Estimates

Reservoir Approx. Surface Area

(sq mi)

Annual Evaporation (ft/year) Approx. Annual Water Loss

(Billion gal/yr)

Primary Data Source
Lake Mead 247 6.22 212–277 U.S. Geological Survey (Energy Balance & Eddy Covariance)
Lake Mohave 44 5.64 49–52 U.S. Geological Survey (Energy Balance & Eddy Covariance)
Lake Powell 254 ~4.5–6.0 147–196 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Water Accounting
Lake Havasu 31 ~6.0–6.7 37–42 Lower Colorado River Accounting / Bureau of Reclamation
Elephant Butte Reservoir 57 ~5.5–6.5 16–46 Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Studies

Although these reservoirs differ substantially in size and climate, they collectively demonstrate that evaporation represents a significant component of long-term water management. Even relatively modest reductions in evaporative losses can preserve billions of gallons of stored water over the life of a reservoir.

Free Preliminary Reservoir Evaporation Assessment

Every water body is unique. Climate, elevation, reservoir geometry, operating water level, wind exposure, solar radiation, and water temperature all influence annual evaporation losses.

GES provides free reservoir evaporation assessments for water storage assets for municipalities, engineering firms, mining companies, agricultural operators, industrial facilities, and water utilities.

A preliminary assessment typically includes:

  • Estimated annual evaporation loss
  • Estimated annual water volume lost
  • Climate-based evaporation profile
  • Preliminary evaporation reduction potential
  • Initial evaluation of floating reservoir cover technologies
  • Discussion of potential water quality and operational benefits

These screening assessments are intended to support early-stage engineering discussions and determine whether a more detailed reservoir-specific evaluation is warranted.

To request a complimentary assessment, simply provide the reservoir location, approximate dimensions, and available operating information to the GES team here.

Disclaimer

The estimates presented herein are based on published measurements, publicly available operational records, and engineering estimates developed by Global Environmental Solutions. They are not intended for regulatory reporting, interstate water accounting, water rights administration, permitting, or final engineering design. Reservoir-specific engineering studies should be completed before operational, regulatory, or capital investment decisions are made.

About Global Environmental Solutions

Global Environmental Solutions (GES) develops practical environmental technologies that help municipalities, industrial facilities, mining operations, agricultural producers, and infrastructure owners solve complex environmental challenges through applied engineering.

GES specializes in water conservation, reservoir evaporation reduction, dust suppression, erosion control, environmental remediation, water quality improvement, and specialty chemical technologies. By combining scientific research with real-world operational experience, GES develops solutions that improve environmental performance while reducing long-term operating costs. GES is committed to advancing practical, science-based environmental technologies that help customers improve operational efficiency while protecting valuable natural resources.

For additional information or to start a complimentary reservoir evaporation assessments please contact Global Environmental Solutions.